Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1477 days newer than GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 102% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance - 340 vs 168 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
340
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Apr 15th, 2020
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 15th, 2020
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
73.92 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
76%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 15th, 2020
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
60%
Multi-Core
5396
47%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
