Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 359 days newer than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 97% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - 130 vs 66 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
FPS
66
51%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
May 1st, 2024
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1876
78%
Multi-Core
9010
78%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 8th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 6800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
