Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF outperforms the more expensive ROG Strix III G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 59% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ROG Strix III G - 43 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than ROG Strix III G - CA$1349.0 vs CA$2199.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ROG Strix III G - CA$31.37 vs CA$81.48 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
FPS
43
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$31.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Jun 28th, 2019
FPS
27
62%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$81.48/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$2199.99
61%
Buy for CA$2,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
Jun 28th, 2019
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jun 28th, 2019
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-10870H
2.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1433
100%
Multi-Core
6094
100%
CPU Winner
Jun 28th, 2019
Core i7-9750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1351
94%
Multi-Core
4930
80%
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | ROG Strix III G Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2019 |
| Core i7-10870H | CPU | Core i7-9750H |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
