Key Differences
In short — HP OMEN 16" FHD 165Hz outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 16% cheaper than HP OMEN 16" FHD 165Hz - CA$2023.65 vs CA$2399.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Starfield than HP OMEN 16" FHD 165Hz - CA$65.28 vs CA$70.56 per FPS
Advantages of HP OMEN 16" FHD 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 10% better in Starfield than ASUS TUF - 34 vs 31 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
31
91.17647058823529%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$65.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2023.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$2,023.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128456 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
34
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$70.56/FPS
92.51700680272108%
Price, CA$
CA$2399
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
92.83400809716599%
Multi-Core
10780
92.72320660588336%
2nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | HP OMEN 16" FHD 165Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
