Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF A17 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing ASUS TUF A17 is 85 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of ASUS TUF A17 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 83 vs 77 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 6th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 6th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 6th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
ASUS TUF A17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
