Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA outperforms HP Victus on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 156% better in Dirt 5 than HP Victus - 128 vs 50 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
73%
Multi-Core
7120
62%
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Victus Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
