Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Helios 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 318 days newer than Acer Predator Helios 16.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Acer Predator Helios 16 - 86 vs 78 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 1st, 2024
FPS
86
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Jun 18th, 2023 • 1st Variation
FPS
78
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 1st, 2024
Jun 18th, 2023 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Jun 18th, 2023 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
Jun 18th, 2023 • 1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Helios 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2023 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
