Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 500 Pro Notebook outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A17 FA706IHR on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A17 FA706IHR is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 500 Pro Gaming Notebook
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than ASUS TUF A17 FA706IHR - 125 vs 102 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF A17 FA706IHR Gaming Laptop
- Up to 35% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 Pro Notebook - CA$1537.65 vs CA$2355.76
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Acer Predator Triton 500 Pro Notebook - CA$15.08 vs CA$18.85 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$18.85/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$2355.76
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,355.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76704 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
102
81.6%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$15.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1537.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,537.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
84.16666666666666%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
67.33333333333333%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
100%
Multi-Core
5046
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 Pro Gaming Notebook | vs | ASUS TUF A17 FA706IHR Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-9750H | CPU | Ryzen 5 4600H |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
