Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC 16.1“ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGIC 16.1“ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop
- Up to 83% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - CA$699.99 vs CA$4199.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing War Thunder than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - CA$7.0 vs CA$17.36 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 142% better in War Thunder than ACEMAGIC 16.1“ - 242 vs 100 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.36/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$4199.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$4,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 5700U | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| Radeon Vega 8 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
