Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Vega 3 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 107 days newer than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile.
Advantages of Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 49% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile - 52 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile - 4 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
52
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$498.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$498.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
4.004 GPixel/s
8%
Texel Fillrate
12.01 GTexel/s
13%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Picasso | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1001 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |