The Radeon RX 6800 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only CA$1306.40 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 79% cheaper – CA$350.29 vs CA$1656.69
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 75 vs 300 Watts
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
159
100%
Min 1% FPS
97
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1656.69
21%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.41/FPS
65%
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,656.69
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,375.75
In Stock
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
33%
Min 1% FPS
23
24%
Price, CA$
CA$350.29
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.73/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.74 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
13%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6800 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 28th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 300 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
288 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
648 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
20.74 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
