The Radeon RX 6650M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 110 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
96
61%
Min 1% FPS
53
55%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
157
100%
Min 1% FPS
96
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
52%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
35%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
24.72 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 110 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 386.3 GTexel/s |
| 8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 24.72 TFLOPS |
