The Radeon RX 6550M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 80 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6800 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
49%
Min 1% FPS
36
42%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
143
100%
Min 1% FPS
86
100%
Price, CA$
CA$779.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.45/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$779.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,656.31
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,616.59
In Stock
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6800 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6800 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6800 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
36%
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $579.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| 181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 16.17 TFLOPS |
