The Radeon RX 6550M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 80 vs 110 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
45%
Min 1% FPS
36
38%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
157
100%
Min 1% FPS
96
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
68%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
24%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
24.72 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 110 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 386.3 GTexel/s |
| 5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 24.72 TFLOPS |
