The Radeon RX 590 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 175 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
74%
Min 1% FPS
37
69%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
82%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 15th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 222.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 7.119 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
