The Radeon RX 590 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 175 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon RX 590 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
60%
Min 1% FPS
37
52%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$389.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$409.85
In Stock
Radeon RX 590 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 590 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 590 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
41%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 15th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 222.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 7.119 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
