The Radeon RX 5700 is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 120 vs 180 Watts
Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
86%
Min 1% FPS
44
81%
Price, CA$
CA$477.84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.75/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
110.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
248.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.949 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
68%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
68%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$349.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
110.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
248.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
7.949 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |