The Radeon RX 560 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's CA$62.25 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 18% cheaper – CA$289.99 vs CA$352.24
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
50%
Min 1% FPS
23
40%
Price, CA$
CA$352.24
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.77/FPS
41%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
