The Radeon RX 560 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R5 240 OEM and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only CA$218.78 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 62% cheaper – CA$133.46 vs CA$352.24
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, CA$
CA$352.24
37%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.77/FPS
49%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
77%
Min 1% FPS
15
65%
Price, CA$
CA$133.46
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.33/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
23%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
$99.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Polaris | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.24 GPixel/s |
81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 18.72 GTexel/s |
2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 599 GFLOPS |