The Radeon RX 460 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only CA$35.05 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 10% cheaper – CA$333.16 vs CA$368.21
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 75 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
70%
Min 1% FPS
22
59%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
77%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
CA$368.21
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.04/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
41%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
