The Radeon RX 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's CA$394.34 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 54% cheaper – CA$333.16 vs CA$727.50
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
80%
Min 1% FPS
22
71%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, CA$
CA$727.5
45%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.36/FPS
57%
Buy on Amazon
CA$727.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$498.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
87%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
72%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |