The Radeon RX 460 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only CA$41.93 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 11% cheaper – CA$333.16 vs CA$375.09
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
93%
Min 1% FPS
22
88%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375.09
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.81/FPS
96%
Buy on Amazon
CA$375.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$178.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$292.95
In Stock
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
99%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
99%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
