In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 M395X is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 214% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 214% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 05, 2015
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 M395X vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
69 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 M395X vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 M395X vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
17%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 M395X May 5th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Gem System (R9 M300) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
