The Radeon R9 390 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon PRO W7500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 70 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
80%
Min 1% FPS
33
73%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, CA$
CA$669.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.97/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
59%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
84%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
42%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
45%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
