The Radeon R9 390 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The GeForce GTX 1070 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 150 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
82%
Min 1% FPS
33
77%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Average FPS
82
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, CA$
CA$497.42
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.06/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
59%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
79%
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
202 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.463 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 10th, 2016 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 202 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.463 TFLOPS |
