The Radeon R9 290X is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290X
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 100 vs 290 Watts
Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Average FPS
67
93%
Min 1% FPS
33
89%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
176 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.632 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
78%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 290 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
176 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
5.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |
