Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms Radeon R9 290 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 3558 days newer than Radeon R9 290.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Radeon R9 290 - 30 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 70 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 8 vs 4 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
30
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$22.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$669.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$669.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R9 290 | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$399 | MSRP | $429 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |