The Radeon R9 290 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 180 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
75%
Min 1% FPS
32
68%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2500
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$28.73/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
59%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| 4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |
