The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The GeForce RTX 2070 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 175 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 2070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
57%
Min 1% FPS
27
47%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, CA$
CA$399.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.96/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$399.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$299.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 2070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 2070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 2070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
44%
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2018 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.7 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 233.3 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.465 TFLOPS |
