The Radeon R9 285 is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The GeForce GTX 1650 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 75 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
91%
Min 1% FPS
27
87%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, CA$
CA$727.5
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.36/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$727.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$498.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
55%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
73%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
91%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $249.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
