The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon RX 6600 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 160 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
49%
Min 1% FPS
23
39%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Average FPS
105
100%
Min 1% FPS
59
100%
Price, CA$
CA$397
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.78/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$397.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,481.18
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.6 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2021 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 160 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.7 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 331.4 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.6 TFLOPS |