The Radeon R7 265 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 265
The GeForce GTX 1650 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Average FPS
48
75%
Min 1% FPS
21
68%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, CA$
CA$727.5
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.36/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$727.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$498.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
63%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
71%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 265 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| 59.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| 1.894 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
