Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1895 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 30% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 265 - 52 vs 40 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
52
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$235.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 938 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 265 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
900 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
925 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |