Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3509 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 115 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 98% better in DOOM Eternal than Radeon R7 260X - 295 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 16 vs 2 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
295
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$749.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7588 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$139 | MSRP | $499 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |