The Radeon R7 250 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 55 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
25%
Min 1% FPS
16
16%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2308.5
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.9/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,308.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$950.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,602.19
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$4,388.51
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$4,913.75
In Stock
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |
