The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 30 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
84%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, CA$
CA$205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
77%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
27%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
