The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
49%
Min 1% FPS
16
36%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$477.84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.75/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
26%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
8%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
