The Radeon R5 240 OEM is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 50 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
60%
Min 1% FPS
15
45%
Price, CA$
CA$133.46
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.33/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
12%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
