Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is 3485 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB - CA$0.45 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB - 50 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Performs up to 32% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 451 vs 341 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 8 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
341
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$152.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$152.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7224 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
451
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$619.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$619.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7223 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
5%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |