The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only CA$255.54 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 66% cheaper – CA$133.46 vs CA$389.00
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
33%
Min 1% FPS
15
21%
Price, CA$
CA$133.46
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.33/FPS
95%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389
34%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.18/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$389.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$409.85
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
3%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
