The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's CA$117.67 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 230 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 7% cheaper – CA$1531.30 vs CA$1648.97
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
49%
Min 1% FPS
45
43%
Price, CA$
CA$1648.97
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$19.63/FPS
46%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1531.3
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
84%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
230 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 16 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
