The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only CA$150.04 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 29% cheaper – CA$371.68 vs CA$521.72
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Average FPS
51
42%
Min 1% FPS
22
31%
Price, CA$
CA$371.68
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.28/FPS
59%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, CA$
CA$521.72
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.27/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$521.72
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$389.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$409.85
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
3.892 TFLOPS
23%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 34.75 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 121.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 3.892 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
