The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only CA$23.42 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 7% cheaper – CA$309.74 vs CA$333.16
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
96%
Min 1% FPS
21
95%
Price, CA$
CA$309.74
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.32/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
97%
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
87%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
87%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
