The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only CA$322.92 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 54% cheaper – CA$277.08 vs CA$600.00
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
57%
Min 1% FPS
20
45%
Price, CA$
CA$277.08
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.89/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600
46%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.22/FPS
82%
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
23%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
