The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only CA$60.39 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 22% cheaper – CA$216.69 vs CA$277.08
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 31 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, CA$
CA$277.08
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.89/FPS
92%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
85%
Min 1% FPS
15
75%
Price, CA$
CA$216.69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.41/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
7%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
3%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
