Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 7900 XT is 1978 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT - 35 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 7900 XT
- Performs up to 12200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 123 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$9.35 vs CA$204.90 per FPS
- Up to 900% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 20 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$204.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7126 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 3rd, 2022
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1150.23
17%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,150.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7126 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 3rd, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
4%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
5%
Desktop • Nov 3rd, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 3rd, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Navi III |
$149 | MSRP | $899 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 20 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 320-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 800 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2394 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2500 MHz |