The Radeon PRO W7600 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's CA$378.41 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7600
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 130 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 51% cheaper – CA$369.99 vs CA$748.40
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon PRO W7600 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
107
88%
Min 1% FPS
60
85%
Price, CA$
CA$748.4
49%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.99/FPS
43%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$389.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$409.85
In Stock
Radeon PRO W7600 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7600 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7600 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
19.99 TFLOPS
100%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
130 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 156.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 312.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
19.99 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
