Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 484 days newer than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 188% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon Pro W6400 - 92 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 44% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon Pro W6400 - CA$8.15 vs CA$14.58 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 16 vs 4 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
32
35%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.58/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$466.6
100%
Buy for CA$466.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7649 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
92
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$749.99
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7648 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
32%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |