Buy on Amazon
CA$476.23
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP $149
Availability
MSRP $149
Buy on Amazon
CA$231.98
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
CA$498.5
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
CA$199.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 51% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - CA$231.98 vs CA$476.23
- Up to 51% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Radeon Pro W6400 - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.29 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
370
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$476.23
48%
AMD Radeon PRO W6400 Graphic Card
Buy for CA$476.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
370
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$231.98
100%
Value Winner
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)
Buy for CA$231.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
| 1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |
PC Builds Using Radeon Pro W6400 or GeForce GTX 1650
With selected game settings
243 FPS
CA$3.81/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-12100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$924.71
In Stock
131 FPS
CA$6.8/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100
4 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$891.32
In Stock
131 FPS
CA$6.86/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$898.07
In Stock
131 FPS
CA$5.34/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$699
In Stock
133 FPS
CA$12.02/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400F
8 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,599
In Stock
206 FPS
CA$6.43/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,324.99
In Stock
133 FPS
CA$7.88/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,047.99
In Stock
133 FPS
CA$8.27/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400F
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,099.99
In Stock
209 FPS
CA$5.02/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 7 5700G
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,049.99
In Stock
131 FPS
CA$10.84/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100
16 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,419.99
In Stock
149 FPS
CA$9.04/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 4500
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,347.7
In Stock
153 FPS
CA$13.7/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10700
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,096.62
In Stock
157 FPS
CA$7.77/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10700F
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,219.99
In Stock
206 FPS
CA$4.85/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$999
In Stock
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
