The Radeon Pro W5700 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 205 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 8 GB
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
40%
Min 1% FPS
54
33%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
8%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
205 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
