The Radeon Pro Duo is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro Duo
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 65 vs 350 Watts
Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
66%
Min 1% FPS
21
55%
Price, CA$
CA$205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
20%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro Duo | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 26th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Radeon Pro GCN | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 350 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
